Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra
Webpetitioner: ganesh bhavan patel & anr. vs. respondent: state of maharashtra date of judgment18/10/1978 bench: sarkaria, ranjit singh bench: sarkaria, ranjit singh … WebDeshmukh v. State of Maharashtra, reported in (2008) 11 SCC 186 has held as under : 13. ... benefit of doubt (vide Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, Babu v. State of U.P., Awadhesh v. State of M.P., Thanedar Singh v. State of M.P. and State of Rajasthan v. Raja Ram). 5
Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra
Did you know?
WebSep 23, 1993 · In (1978) SCC 371 : ( AIR 1979 SC 135) (Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra). The Apex Court was pleased..., AIR 1976 SC 975 (Bhagrith v. WebFeb 2, 2014 · Ganesh Bhavan Patel and Another vs. State of Maharashtra (1978) 4 SCC 371, Aleque Padamsee and Others vs. Union of India and Others (2007) 6 SCC 171, …
WebMar 31, 2024 · In Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra [(1978) 4 SCC 371: AIR 1979 SC 135] the eye witnesses to the crime proper was examined with a delay of one day. Though the delay of a few hours may not by itself constitute a serious infirmity, that there are concomitant circumstances which suggest that the investigator was deliberately marking ... WebIn this regard, he relied upon the pronouncement of the Apex Court in the case of Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, . Highlighting the same, he further contended that even though the police were aware of the incident much earlier to 9'0 clock as the police station is hardly one forlong away from the Crime seene, non action on the ...
WebSee ( 1978) 4 SCC 371 : A.I.R 1979 Supreme Court 135 1 ( Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra ). 4. Before concluding we may in passing mention that the sale in the instant case was of 18th January 1972 i.e over 16 years ago. The acquittal order is of 12th May 1980 over eight years ago. 5. WebIn this claim, he relied on the following decisions, viz., Bhajan Lal (supra), Ganesh Bhavan Patel and Another v. State of Maharashtra (1978), Aleque Padamsee and Others v. Union of India and Others (2007), Ramesh Kumari (supra), Ram Lal Narang b. State of Delhi (1979) and Lallan Chaudhary and Others v. State of Bihar and Another (2006).
WebAug 14, 1997 · State of Tripura 1986 1 SCC 549; Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1979 SC 135; Awadhesh v. State of M.P [1988 2 SCC 557 = 1988 3 …
WebApr 28, 1992 · State Of Rajasthan (33) (3), Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra (4) and Lala Ram v. State of U.P (5). (6) The learned public prosecutor duly supported the conviction and sentence under challenge. He contended that the FIR Ex. P/1 was lodged within two hours and 5 minutes of the occurrence when the Police Station was at a … official bunnings warehouse websiteWebIn this context it would be useful to refer to the observations of Their Lordships of the Apex Court in paragraph 15 and 18 of the judgment Ganesh Bhawan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, which are to the following effect : "15 ..... myelination and nodes of ranvierWeb(See State of U.P. V Satish, (2005) 3 SCC 114, Padala Veera Reddy v State of A.P., 1989 Supp (2) SCC 706, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116, Gambhir v State of Maharashtra, (1982) 2 SCC 351 (para 9) and Hanumant Govind Nargundkar v State of M.P., AIR 1952 SC official buffet crampon clarinet repairWeb6. Reliance is also placed on the decision of Supreme Court in Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra - wherein was held that "delay of a few hours, simpliciter, in recording the statements of eye witnesses may not, by itself, amount to a serious infirmity in the prosecution case. But it may assume such a character if there are concomitant ... myelination and adhdWebJul 24, 2015 · All three accused are said to have run away from the place then, leaving their bicycles behind. Manilal was removed to the..., Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra 1979 2 SCR 94 to which one of us (Sarkaria, J.) was party, it was also observed: [SCC p. 376: SCC (Cri) p. ... official bulova watch repairWebIt is well settled that the appellate Court should be slow in disturbing the finding of fact of the trial Court, and, even if two views are reasonably possible, it is not expected to interfere simply because it feels that it would have taken a different view if the case had been tried by it (See: : Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra.). 10. myelination and mtorWebFeb 8, 2005 · State Of M.P 2004 1 SCC 414) 19. The High Court has placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra 1978 4 SCC 371. A bare reading of the fact situation of that case shows that the delayed examination by IO was not the only factor which was considered to be determinative. official burlington workday login website